Filed daily by the desk RSSSearchSubscribe
Stay Gazette
Airbnb, Vrbo and the business of short-term rentals, reported daily
The towers of downtown San Francisco rise beyond the red span and south tower of the Golden Gate Bridge, seen across blue water under a clear sky.
PlatformsThe record · August 2022

Airbnb Starts Screening Bookings for Party Risk in the US and Canada

Airbnb began testing a system that stopped flagged guests from booking entire homes before the request reached a host. It cited one figure from an Australian pilot, and a privacy group asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate.

By Jesse Kohl Platforms EditorFiled 11 October 20267 min read

San Francisco, where Airbnb was based in August 2022, seen from the Marin Headlands with the Golden Gate Bridge in the foreground. Photographed on 22 August 2022. Photo: San Francisco from the Marin Headlands in August 2022 by Lightandtruth, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons (resized).

From the record. This is a look back at August 2022. The desk wrote it on 11 October 2026 from sources published at the time; Stay Gazette opened in July 2026 and did not report this as it happened.

On 16 August 2022, Airbnb said it was introducing new anti-party tools in the United States and Canada: a screening system that judged a reservation attempt for party risk and stopped a flagged guest from booking an entire home. The company said a similar system, piloted in Australia since October 2021, had come with a 35 percent drop in incidents of unauthorized parties in the areas where it ran.

The announcement asked nothing of hosts. According to the Associated Press, the technology was designed to keep a flagged request from ever reaching the host of the property. A guest turned away from an entire home could still book a private room, where a host was more likely to be on site, or a hotel room through Airbnb. Airbnb described the North American launch as the start of testing and said it would report the results.

What the system looked at

Airbnb named some of the signals in its announcement:

  • a guest's history of positive reviews, or the lack of one;
  • how long the guest had been on Airbnb;
  • the length of the trip;
  • the distance to the listing;
  • whether the stay fell on a weekend or a weekday.

It said there were many other factors and did not list them.

The target was narrow. Airbnb defined unauthorized parties as those held without a host's knowledge or consent, and said its main aim was to make it harder for what it called bad actors to throw them. Hosts, the company said, did not want the property damage and other problems such parties could bring.

Airbnb presented the tool as a sharper version of a rule hosts already knew. Since 2020, an under-25 system in North America had focused mainly on local bookings by guests younger than 25 who had no positive reviews. Fast Company reported that it kept those users from booking an entire property near their home until they had at least three positive reviews. Airbnb called the new screening more robust and sophisticated, and said: “We anticipate that this new system will help prevent more bad actors on our platform while having less of a blunt impact on guests who are not trying to throw a party.”

Why Airbnb moved

The screening enforced a policy Airbnb had made permanent earlier that summer. On 28 June 2022 the company codified the ban on all parties and events that it had announced as a temporary measure in August 2020. In that June announcement it said it believed the 2020 policy was directly linked to a 44% year-over-year drop in the rate of party reports, and that over 6,600 guests had been suspended in 2021 for attempting to violate the ban.

The push behind the ban was older than the pandemic. The Associated Press reported that pressure on Airbnb over parties had been growing since 2019, when five people died in a shooting at a Halloween house party in a San Francisco suburb. In late 2019 the company prohibited open-invite parties and what it called chronic party houses, and launched its Neighborhood Support Line. CNN reported that in April 2022 a party at a Pittsburgh property rented through Airbnb ended with two teens killed and several people injured.

TechCrunch reported that a survey published in July 2022 by the smart home company Vivint suggested one in five renters broke the no-party rule. Fast Company noted why such parties were hard to track: the owner of a listing was often not at the property, so guests checked in remotely and could invite whomever they wanted.

The one figure Airbnb gave

The case for the tool rested on a single result, and it was Airbnb's own. The company said the Australian pilot had been very effective and reported that incidents of unauthorized parties had dropped 35 percent in the parts of Australia the pilot covered. It said it was ending the pilot phase there and making the product permanent nationwide, and that it hoped for similar success as it began testing in the US and Canada.

That was the only result figure in the announcement. It gave no count of reservation attempts the system had blocked and no rate of error.

Airbnb did concede limits. The announcement said no system is perfect, and that the company aimed to make its systems as precise and as fair as it could. Naba Banerjee, Airbnb's global head of product, operations, and strategy for trust and safety, put it more bluntly. “We are, at the end of the day, an open marketplace, we are making real-world connections, and we are often a mirror of society. And no solution is 100% perfect,” Banerjee told Fast Company.

The objection filed two days later

On 18 August 2022, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, known as EPIC, wrote to the Federal Trade Commission about the system. The letter was a follow-up to a complaint the group had filed against Airbnb in 2020. It said Airbnb had not disclosed the logic or the full range of factors the system relied on, and had not established that it was accurate, fair or free of bias.

“The factors relied on by Airbnb’s ‘anti-party technology’ pose a substantial risk of disparate and unfair impact,” the letter said. EPIC argued that blocking a reservation because of the distance between a user and a listing could operate as a form of digital redlining that kept users from majority-minority areas from renting homes in certain places. It argued that weighing weekends against weekdays and the length of a trip could put up unfair economic barriers, because low-income people might be unable to travel on weekdays or to take long trips.

EPIC asked the commission to investigate. It wanted Airbnb required to disclose in full the factors and logic behind such systems, and to put them through independent testing, with the results published, for accuracy and civil rights impacts before they were used.

The Gazette Verdict, looking back

Airbnb made the right call for hosts in August 2022, and it made it on thin evidence. A party is the host's loss: the property damage lands on the home, and the neighbors remember the address. An under-25 rule that sorted guests by age was the blunt version of the fix. Screening the attempt before it reached the host moved the risk to where the information was, on the platform. But the proof was one figure from Airbnb's own Australian pilot, with no count of blocked attempts and no error rate. Every booking stopped by mistake was income a host never saw offered, and only Airbnb could see the tally. What a host should have taken from it: the screen was one layer, the announcement itself said no system is perfect, and the house rules and the neighbors stayed the host's job.

The other side

EPIC's letter made the strongest case against calling this the right call. A system that decides who may rent a home, using factors the company did not fully list, cannot be judged right on the company's word. Distance from the listing, the day of the week and the length of a trip are facts about plenty of ordinary guests, and EPIC warned those signals could fall hardest on users from majority-minority areas and on low-income travelers. On that view, the missing error rate was the whole question. Until Airbnb published how the system worked and let an independent tester measure it, nobody outside the company, hosts included, could say whether it was stopping parties or simply stopping people.

What it meant for hosts

Airbnb's announcement gave a host in the US or Canada nothing to switch on in August 2022. The screen ran before a reservation attempt went through, and the practical changes were quieter than a new setting.

  • Entire-home listings were the ones covered. A guest stopped by the system could still book a private room or a hotel room on Airbnb, so a host renting a room in a home they occupied could still receive those guests.
  • A host could not see what the system had turned away. Airbnb published no count of blocked attempts for North America, and the launch was described as a test with results to come.
  • The party ban remained the rule. Disruptive parties and events, including open-invite gatherings, stayed prohibited, and party houses stayed strictly prohibited.
  • Hosts of large homes had a separate change coming: Airbnb had said in June 2022 that it would remove the 16-person occupancy cap that came with the 2020 ban.
  • Neighbors still had a direct route to the company. Airbnb said it would keep investing in its Neighborhood Support Line, which took reports of parties in progress and concerns about nearby listings.

The under-25 system already let Airbnb refuse some entire-home bookings on a guest's profile. The August 2022 test widened that profile beyond age, reviews and local bookings to time on the platform, trip length and the day of the week, and the decision was made before the host saw the request.

Sources

  1. Airbnb Newsroom, New anti-party technology in the US and Canada (16 August 2022).
  2. Associated Press (via Spectrum News), Airbnb is rolling out new screening tools to stop parties (16 August 2022).
  3. TechCrunch, Airbnb launches ‘anti-party’ tech to spot potential rule-breakers at the point of booking (17 August 2022).
  4. CNN Business (via KVIA), Airbnb rolls out 'anti-party technology' to help enforce its global ban (17 August 2022).
  5. Fast Company (South Africa edition), Inside AirBnB plan to stop crazy parties (17 August 2022).
  6. Electronic Privacy Information Center, EPIC Urges FTC to Investigate Airbnb’s Opaque and Unproven “Anti-Party” Algorithm (18 August 2022).
  7. Electronic Privacy Information Center, EPIC In re Airbnb Supplemental Letter (18 August 2022).
  8. Airbnb Newsroom, Airbnb officially codifies party ban (28 June 2022).

Part of the Stay Gazette record for August 2022. Filed on 11 October 2026; every specific was checked against the sources above, which were read on or before that day. To report an error, write to the desk; see the corrections policy.